Comparative Commentary Essay

For most of the people, hurts be cute and ask well-nighhow friendly. Even though we know, that those animals can be very dangerous, the returns are often underestimated. Not only because we cannot find them in our near environment, and thusly dont know which impact they have, but also because we leaven up watching series like Winnie the Poo (1977) or Brother render (2003), where affords have the hero and victim roles. Both these textual matters are based on the relation between the bear and man. The first is a newspaper article, touch with the bears extinction. The wink text is an extract from a nineteenth-century novel, elevating the side of the bear and forgiving its misdemeanors.The theme of the first text is the survival of the bear. It explains how pressing it is to do something against its possible extinction. The article states the causes of depletion and includes various statistics supporting their arguments. Besides the text is concerned about the bears all over the world and mentions a ply of species, including the brown bear and the panda. The second text is more than about the indomitability of the bear and its mythic dimensions. It has to do with a conflict which arises when trying to discerp the bear and putting it into the right category.The text notes that there can be a mutual respect between a man and a bear but moreover it notes a representation of the mighty bear twain, realistic view, mentioning the accidents and attacks which happen because of them, but also a romantic side, where the bear is said to be unstoppable. The whole extract is emotional rather than statistical and is about one particular bear. The antecedent makes some close ups, feel at the bears appearance, habits and its personality, which proves once more, that the text is based on personal get wind. The author also tries to compare the bear to a human, which makes the endorser understand the bears situation and lets the bear appear as a victim rather th an a perpetrator.Both texts are written in the third person, but this is the only thing they have in common connect to its perspectives. The first text is an objective article and shows a degree of partiality. Because some statistics have been used, the article is scientific and could be seen as part of an encyclopedia. The second text is told by an omniscient narrator. It is subjective, because the bears history and thoughts are involved in the narration. The narrator admires the bear despite its attacks and defenses his actions.Also the expressageion differs in both texts a lot. The first text uses primarily not figurative language. It is mainly unbiased, dry and therefore it seems to be reliable. The diction was occasionally loaded or colored, using words like carnivores and exterminated, or expressions like The prognosis for wild bears is bleak. The syntax in the article is lively, fast paces and dynamic. The sentences are sort of complex to emphasize the tone of emergency. The other texts language is more dramatic and overstated. Figurative language has been used, like with no more effect than so many peas blown through a pipe by a child Alliterations (beginning back before the son was born) emphasize its fame. Using varying diction, like loomed and towered, the huge crustal plate of the bear can be measured. The syntax is also complex to express awe, wonder and incredulity.Both texts speak in favor of the bear and against its possible extinction. The scientific articles aim is a direct way to incite the reader to support them. The author wants to show the readers in which way they might uphold and which effects it would have. The second text though, is more about an honest experience by someone who admires bears. The narrators motive was not to convince someone, but only to tell his story related to a bear.